Section 1.5: Exercise 21
Proof:
\(\Rightarrow\): Since \(S_1 \cup S_2\) is linearly dependent, then there exists vectors \(u_1,u_2,...,u_n\) in \(S_1\), the vectors \(w_1,w_2,...,w_m\) in \(S_2\) and not all zero scalars \(a_1,...a_n,b_1,...,b_m\) such that
Re-arranging the terms
Let \(w = a_1u_1 + a_2u_2 + ... + a_nu_n = - (b_1w_1 + b_2w_2 + ... + b_nw_m)\). We claim that \(w\) is a non-zero vector. Why? suppose for the sake of contradiction that it was the zero vector. We said earlier that not all the scalars are zero. This is a contradiction because \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) are linearly independent. This means that the solution to \(a_1u_1 + a_2u_2 + ... + a_nu_n = - (b_1w_1 + b_2w_2 + ... + b_nw_m) = \bar{0}\) must only be the trivial solution where all the scalars are zero. Therefore we must have \(w\) be a non-zero vector.
Futhermore, \(w = (a_1u_1 + a_2u_2 + ... + a_nu_n)\) is a linear combination of the elements in \(S_1\) and so it’s a vector in \(Span(S_1)\) by the defintion of the span of a set. Similarly, \(w = - (b_1w_1 + b_2w_2 + ... + b_nw_m)\) is a vector in \(Span(S_2)\). From this, we see that \(w\) is in both the span of \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) and so \(w \in Span(S_1) \cap Span(S_2)\).
\(\Leftarrow\): Suppose now that \(span(S_1) \cap span(S_2) \neq \{\bar{0}\}\). Let \(v\) be a non-zero vector in both \(Span(S_1)\) and \(Span(S_2)\). This means we can write \(v\) a linear combination of the elements of \(S_1\),
And we can also write \(v\) as a linear combination of the elements in \(S_2\) as follows,
From this we see that,
Since \(v\) is non-zero and both \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) are linearly independent, then all of these scalars are non-zero and so this means that \(S_1 \cup S_2\) is linearly dependent by the definition of linear dependence. \(\blacksquare\)