This is the proof for theorem 1.7 from the book which I don’t think we covered in lecture.

Theorem 1.7
If \(S\) is a linearly independent subset of \(V\) and \(v\) is a vector in \(V\) but not \(S\). Then \(S \cup \{v\}\) is linearly dependent if and if only if \(v \in span(S)\).


Proof:

\(\Rightarrow\): Since \(S \cup \{v\}\) is linearly dependent, then there are vectors \(u_1,u_2,...,u_n\) in \(S \cup \{v\}\) and not all zero scalars \(a_1,...,a_n\) such that

$$ \begin{align*} a_1u_1 + a_2u_2 + ... + a_nu_n = \bar{0}. \end{align*} $$

But we know that \(S\) is linearly independent so this means one of the vectors in \(\{u_1,u_2,...,u_n\}\) must be \(v\). without the loss of generality let \(u_1 = v\) and so

$$ \begin{align*} \bar{0} &= a_1v + a_2u_2 + ... + a_nu_n \\ v &= \frac{1}{a_1}(-a_2u_2 - ... - a_nu_n) \\ v &= -\frac{a_2}{a_1}u_2 - ... - \frac{a_n}{a_1}u_n. \\ \end{align*} $$

This tells us that \(v\) is a linear combination of the elements of \(u_2,...,u_n\) in \(S\). Therefore, by definition, \(v \in span(S)\).

\(\Leftarrow\): Let \(v \in span(S)\), then there exists vectors \(w_1,w_2,...,w_m\) in \(S\) and scalars \(b_1,...,b_n\) such that

$$ \begin{align*} v = b_1w_1 + b_2w_2 + ... + b_nw_m. \end{align*} $$

Moving \(v\) to the other side, we see that,

$$ \begin{align*} b_1w_1 + b_2w_2 + ... + b_nw_m + (-1).v = \bar{0}. \end{align*} $$

We know here that \(v\) is not in \(S\) and so none of the vectors \(w_1,...,w_m\) are equal to \(v\). Moreover, the coefficient of \(v\) is none zero. Therefore, by the definition of linear dependence, \(S \cup \{v\}\) is linearly dependent. \(\blacksquare\).

References: