Strategy
We want to find \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for any \(\epsilon > 0\)
The trick here to add and subtract a term \(yx_n\) and then use the triangle inequality
We can make \(\lvert a_n - a \rvert\) be as small as we want and similarly we can make \(\lvert y_n - y \rvert\) be as small as we want. The idea is to bound these two terms to values such that the total will be exactly \(\epsilon\) which is what we want to prove. So, given that \(\lim y_n = y\), then we know that there exists an \(N_1 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for \(n \geq N_1\),
Similarly, given that \(\lim y_n = y\), then we know that there exists an \(N_2 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for \(n \geq N_2\),
We still need to bound the term \(|x_n|\) since it’s not a constant. But we know since it converges, then it’s bounded and there is an \(M > 0\) such that every term \(|x_n| \leq M\). Therefore, let
If we plug in everything back, we get
Finally we can choose \(N\) to be the maximum of \(N_1\) and \(N_2\) to guarantee the above bounds.
Formal Proof
Let \(\epsilon > 0\) be given. Since \((x_n)_n\) is convergent, then we know it’s bounded. Therefore, there exists an \(M\) such that \(|x_n| \leq M\) (if \(M = 0\), then let \(M = 1\)). Moreover, since \(\lim x_n = x\), then there is an \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for all \(n \geq N_1\),
Similarly, since \(\lim y_n = y\), there exists an \(N_2 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for all \(n \geq N_2\),
Therefore, choose a natural number \(N\) such that \(N = \max(N_1,N_2)\). Assume \(n \geq N\). Then,
Thus, since \(\lvert x_ny_n - xy \rvert < \epsilon\) for all \(n \geq N\), then \(\lim (x_ny_n) = xy\) as we wanted to show. \(\ \blacksquare\)
References
- Introduction to Analysis, An, 4th edition by William Wade
- Lecture Notes by Professor Chun Kit Lai