Strategy/Notes
We want to show that \(\lim (x_n + y_n) = x + y\). So we want to find \(N\) such that for any \(\epsilon > 0\),
We can use the triangle inequality to bound the term:
So now the goal is to get the right hand side to be \(\epsilon\). To do so we’re given that \(\lim x_n = x\). This means that we can make \(\lvert x_n - x \rvert\) be as small as we want and similarly we can make \(\lvert y_n - y \rvert\) be as small as we want. So if we make each of them be \(\epsilon/2\) then the terms will total to \(\epsilon\) which is what we want. Formally, given that \(\lim x_n = a\), then we know that for some \(n \geq N_1\),
Similarly, given that \(\lim y_n = y\), then we know that for some \(n \geq N_2\),
You can see now if we replace these terms in the equation above we will get
\(N\) can safely be set to the maximum of \(N_1\) and \(N_2\) to guarantee the above bounds.
Formal Proof
Let \(\epsilon > 0\) be arbitrary. Since we want to bound the sum \(\lvert (x_n - x) + (y_n - y) \rvert\), we apply the definition of the limit to each sequence using \(\epsilon/2\). Since \(\lim x_n = x\), then there exists an \(N_1 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for all \(n \geq N_1\), we must have
Similarly, since \(\lim y_n = y\), then there exists an \(N_2 \in \mathbb{N}\) such that for all \(n \geq N_2\), we must have
Therefore, choose \(N\) such that \(N = \max(N_1,N_2)\). Let \(n \geq N\). Then,
Thus, \(\lvert (x_n - x) + (y_n - y) \rvert < \epsilon\) for all \(n \geq N\) so by definition
as we wanted to show. \(\blacksquare\)
References
- Introduction to Analysis, An, 4th edition by William Wade
- Lecture Notes by Professor Chun Kit Lai